<$BlogRSDUrl$>

My personal musings about anything that gets on my radar screen--heavily dominated by politics.

2005-12-19

A Question, Good Senators

If a terrorist slips across our Southern border and hooks up with an arms dealer who provides him with high explosives, and then proceeds to live and work in my city until the time is right to set off a catastrophic explosion, which kills my children, how would you say my children's civil liberties have been protected?

Or, let me rephrase . . .

If a terrorist (who we could not hold onto after having him in custody for fear it would be deemed "degrading") slips across our Southern border (which is wide open because you demagogue and then refuse to increase security measures to stem illegal immigration) and hooks up with an arms dealer (who is well-known to the intelligence community but, thanks to "the wall", is unknown to law enforcement) who provides him with high explosives (which came from some place (ahem . .Syria) you refuse to confront, and were paid for from oil money which was in his pocket because your intransingence on ANWAR forced our dependence on middle eastern oil), and then proceeds to live and work in my city (because you refuse to pass a national ID law or force employers to report properly) until the time is right to set off a catastrophic explosion (which he had previously annouced to his overseas benefactors, but we didn't know about it because we're not allowed to listen to overseas phone calls), which kills my children (because he targeted them--because these scum love targeting children), how would you say my children's civil liberties have been protected?

By the way, don't feel bad for the terrorist: his family will be well taken care of because he was allowed to invest in private retirement accounts (which you refuse to allow over here) overseas--in Chile, perhaps.
Posted by: Michael / 12/19/2005 11:54:00 PM

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?